| contributor author | Xinyi Song | |
| contributor author | Feniosky Peña-Mora | |
| contributor author | Carol C. Menassa | |
| contributor author | Carlos A. Arboleda | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:39:31Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:39:31Z | |
| date copyright | January 2012 | |
| date issued | 2012 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%29co%2E1943-7862%2E0000408.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/58561 | |
| description abstract | Nowadays, along with the inherent intricacy and magnitude of large-scale construction projects come increasingly complex disputes. Because most projects operate on tight budgets, alternative dispute-resolution (ADR) techniques such as negotiation, mediation, and arbitration are being widely adopted in large-scale construction projects to help handle disputes in more effective and cost-saving ways. However, the risk of incurring uncertain ADR-implementation costs in the dispute-resolution process has become an important issue. The traditional self-insured approach of simply retaining all risks is no longer considered economical. One way to reduce the potential for variations in the dispute-resolution budget is to price ADR techniques as an insurance product, which allows project participants to transfer the risk of incurring unexpectedly high ADR-implementation costs to the insurance company. Despite this advantage, many factors are preventing project participants from investing in ADR-implementation insurance. This paper proposes a model on how to use ADR-implementation insurance as a risk management tool for construction dispute resolution. It first investigates the possibility of using insurance for ADR-implementation and then uses subjective loss to represent the risk-averse attitude of project participants and quantify the effect of ADR-implementation costs in monetary terms. Event-tree analysis (ETA) is used to simulate different dispute-resolution processes and determine the probability mass function of ADR-implementation costs by drawing analogies from seismic risk insurance. These probabilities are employed to calculate the expected ADR-implementation costs and to derive the insurance premium. Finally, the gross premium is compared to project participants’ subjective loss to help them determine whether purchasing ADR-implementation insurance is necessary. At the end, a numerical example is presented to illustrate the application of the methodology. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Insurance as a Risk Management Tool for ADR Implementation in Construction Disputes | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 138 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000401 | |
| tree | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |