| contributor author | Darren R. Hale | |
| contributor author | Pramen P. Shrestha | |
| contributor author | G. Edward Gibson Jr. | |
| contributor author | Giovanni C. Migliaccio | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:38:54Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:38:54Z | |
| date copyright | July 2009 | |
| date issued | 2009 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%29co%2E1943-7862%2E0000022.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/58173 | |
| description abstract | This study compares the performance of design/bid/build and design/build to see if one project delivery method is superior in regards to time and cost. Similar military buildings were used to identify two samples of projects delivered with each of the two delivery methods. These projects provide a meaningful comparison because they include buildings of the same typology (i.e., U.S. Navy Bachelor Enlisted Quarters) delivered using similar design models. Project duration, project duration per bed, project time growth, cost growth and cost per bed were statistically compared. Upon completion of the analysis, the hypothesis that design/build projects are superior to design/bid/build projects in regards to time and cost was tested. Design/build projects were proven superior in performance in almost every measure. Other findings, including recommendations to practitioners and researchers, will be provided as well. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Empirical Comparison of Design/Build and Design/Bid/Build Project Delivery Methods | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 135 | |
| journal issue | 7 | |
| journal title | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000017 | |
| tree | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2009:;Volume ( 135 ):;issue: 007 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |
