Show simple item record

contributor authorAlex M. Remennikov
contributor authorSih Ying Kong
contributor authorBrian Uy
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:37:26Z
date available2017-05-08T21:37:26Z
date copyrightOctober 2011
date issued2011
identifier other%28asce%29cf%2E1943-5509%2E0000181.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/57767
description abstractThis paper presents the results of experimental and numerical studies of the comparative behavior of square hollow section (SHS) tubes filled with rigid polyurethane foam (RPF) and concrete undergoing transverse impact loading. A series of instrumented drop hammer tests were performed on mild steel and stainless steel SHSs for both filled and unfilled constructions. The concrete-filled tubes had the highest impact resistance and energy absorption capacity, followed by the steel tubes filled with RPF, and then the hollow tubes. The results also show that RPFs can be used as an effective infill material in structural steel hollow columns when expedient enhancement of the energy absorption capacity is required, e.g., to increase blast and impact resistance of hollow structural elements. Nonlinear dynamic finite-element analyses were carried out to simulate drop hammer test conditions. The predicted impact forces, deformation histories, and failure modes were found to be in good agreement with the experimental results.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleResponse of Foam- and Concrete-Filled Square Steel Tubes under Low-Velocity Impact Loading
typeJournal Paper
journal volume25
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000175
treeJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2011:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record