Show simple item record

contributor authorJesus M. De La Garza
contributor authorMichael C. Vorster
contributor authorCordell M. Parvin
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:33:39Z
date available2017-05-08T21:33:39Z
date copyrightDecember 1991
date issued1991
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281991%29117%3A4%28716%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56175
description abstractTotal float is a by‐product of critical‐path‐method calculations. It represents the length of time that an activity's finish date may be delayed without affecting the completion date of the entire project. Disputes over the existence of total float and its ownership are at the core of most claims involving change‐order work. While some tribunals have ruled in favor of contractors, others have held for owners on very similar facts. This paper is motivated by practical experience with problems concerning float. The paper acknowledges the fact that total float is beneficial to both owners and contractors. It does so by proposing ways of making its commercial trade‐in‐opportunity value explicit. Contract language is also introduced that will allow the trading of total float as a commodity. Such contract language grants the contractor the right to administer total float, imposes on the contractor the obligation to disclose its value and trade it on demand.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleTotal Float Traded as Commodity
typeJournal Paper
journal volume117
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1991)117:4(716)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record