Show simple item record

contributor authorDavid W. Miller
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:32:48Z
date available2017-05-08T21:32:48Z
date copyrightApril 1987
date issued1987
identifier other%28asce%299742-597x%281987%293%3A2%2895%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55646
description abstractEmerging technologies, uncertain legal doctrines, the trend toward increasing litigation, and the lack of insurance have forced many companies to assess risks more carefully and to reemphasize loss prevention programs. “Loss prevention” means actions taken to limit liability exposure through quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC), employee training, legal consultation, and contract screening and review. CH2M HILL is a large consulting engineering firm, which is often the proverbial “deep pocket” in litigation when a project goes sour, a contractor has financial problems, a third party is injured, or a client is dissatisfied. This paper begins by describing two CH2M HILL training efforts in the area of loss prevention: a risk management seminar on project screening, contract review, negotiation, and QA/QC; and a risk management seminar on projects involving hazardous and toxic substances. The writer then describes the internal refocusing that is necessary to ensure that loss prevention becomes corporate policy. The result must be a firm's renewed commitment to providing quality services and to fairly apportioning risks in its contracts.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleLoss Prevention: Safeguards Against Liability
typeJournal Paper
journal volume3
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1987)3:2(95)
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;1987:;Volume ( 003 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record