Show simple item record

contributor authorJoseph A. Steger
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:32:40Z
date available2017-05-08T21:32:40Z
date copyrightApril 1985
date issued1985
identifier other%28asce%299742-597x%281985%291%3A2%28105%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55567
description abstractThe intellectually based effectiveness is differentiated from the emotionally based effectiveness of the manager. Although they are obviously interrelated, the required outcomes of a manager's behavior are largely not a function of intellect, but a function of emotions (both handling inputs and projecting positive emotional outputs). The academic setting does not, in a curricular sense, handle the emotional based effectiveness. And in reality it should not, since this base of effectiveness is so well‐established in the individual by a young age (and is primarily immutable). Selection for line management is the tool to address this facet of management preparedness. On the other hand, the engineering training in evaluation content (technical), if combined with work experience (co‐op), does provide a basis for the intellectual basis of management. However, a good engineering education does not predict management success or effectiveness. And it should not be viewed as designed to insure a cadre of management talent to be line or operating managers. Only selection and carefully designed work experience can insure such a cadre.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEngineers as Managers
typeJournal Paper
journal volume1
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1985)1:2(105)
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;1985:;Volume ( 001 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record