Show simple item record

contributor authorThomas J. Cova
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:31:28Z
date available2017-05-08T21:31:28Z
date copyrightAugust 2005
date issued2005
identifier other%28asce%291527-6988%282005%296%3A3%2899%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/54775
description abstractResidential development in fire-prone wildlands is a growing problem for land-use and emergency planners. In many areas housing is increasing without commensurate improvement in the primary road network. This compromises public safety, as minimum evacuation times are climbing in tandem with vegetation and structural fuels. Current evacuation codes for fire-prone communities require a minimum number of exits regardless of the number of households. This is not as sophisticated as building egress codes which link the maximum occupancy in an enclosed space with the required number, capacity, and arrangement of exits. This paper applies concepts from building codes to fire-prone areas to highlight limitations in existing community egress systems. Preliminary recommendations for improved community evacuation codes are also presented.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePublic Safety in the Urban–Wildland Interface: Should Fire-Prone Communities Have a Maximum Occupancy?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume6
journal issue3
journal titleNatural Hazards Review
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:3(99)
treeNatural Hazards Review:;2005:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record