contributor author | Thomas J. Cova | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:31:28Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T21:31:28Z | |
date copyright | August 2005 | |
date issued | 2005 | |
identifier other | %28asce%291527-6988%282005%296%3A3%2899%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/54775 | |
description abstract | Residential development in fire-prone wildlands is a growing problem for land-use and emergency planners. In many areas housing is increasing without commensurate improvement in the primary road network. This compromises public safety, as minimum evacuation times are climbing in tandem with vegetation and structural fuels. Current evacuation codes for fire-prone communities require a minimum number of exits regardless of the number of households. This is not as sophisticated as building egress codes which link the maximum occupancy in an enclosed space with the required number, capacity, and arrangement of exits. This paper applies concepts from building codes to fire-prone areas to highlight limitations in existing community egress systems. Preliminary recommendations for improved community evacuation codes are also presented. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Public Safety in the Urban–Wildland Interface: Should Fire-Prone Communities Have a Maximum Occupancy? | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 6 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Natural Hazards Review | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:3(99) | |
tree | Natural Hazards Review:;2005:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |