Show simple item record

contributor authorCiro Faella
contributor authorEnzo Martinelli
contributor authorEmidio Nigro
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:31:12Z
date available2017-05-08T21:31:12Z
date copyrightJune 2009
date issued2009
identifier other%28asce%291090-0268%282009%2913%3A3%28226%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/54591
description abstractSeveral proposals have been carried out for modeling a fiber-reinforced-polymer (FRP)-to-concrete interface whose behavior is not completely described by fracture energy value, which could often be derived in closed form. Although the bilinear formulation is one of the most widely accepted relationships, neither standard testing procedures nor well-established calibration and identification techniques are currently available. The present paper mainly deals with the latter aspect and is basically aimed at examining the differences possibly arising from adopting either direct or indirect techniques for identifying the interface relationship. In particular, after an outline of the analytical formulation of both mentioned identification methods, their application is proposed considering a set of experimental results already utilized by other authors in similar studies. Besides the expected superiority of the indirect procedure in identifying the interface relationship, emphasis is placed on the fact that such a procedure is quite unaffected by the possible reduction in the number of experimental data considered in calibrating the interface relationship.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDirect versus Indirect Method for Identifying FRP-to-Concrete Interface Relationships
typeJournal Paper
journal volume13
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Composites for Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2009)13:3(226)
treeJournal of Composites for Construction:;2009:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record