Show simple item record

contributor authorMohamed A. ElGawady
contributor authorPierino Lestuzzi
contributor authorMarc Badoux
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:30:49Z
date available2017-05-08T21:30:49Z
date copyrightDecember 2005
date issued2005
identifier other%28asce%291090-0268%282005%299%3A6%28524%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/54341
description abstractRecent earthquakes have shown the vulnerability of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings, which have led to an increasing demand for techniques to upgrade URM buildings. Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) can provide an upgrading alternative for URM buildings. This paper presents results of dynamic tests investigating the in-plane behavior of URM walls upgraded with FRP (URM-FRP). These tests represent pioneer work in this area (dynamic and in-plane). Five half-scale walls were built, using half-scale brick clay units, and upgraded on one face only. Two moment/shear ratios (1.4 and 0.7), two mortar types (M2.5 and M9), three composite materials (carbon, aramid, and glass), three fiber structures (plates, loose fabric, and grids), and two upgrading configurations (diagonal “X” and full surface shapes) were investigated. The test specimens were subjected to a series of synthetic earthquake motions with increasing intensities on a uniaxial earthquake simulator. The tests validate the effectiveness of the one side upgrading: the upgrading technique improved the lateral resistance of the URM walls by a factor ranging from 1.3 to 2.9; however, the improvement in the lateral drift was less significant. Moreover, no uneven response was observed during the test due to the single side upgrading. Regarding the upgrading configurations, the bidirectional surface type materials (fabrics and grids) applied on the entire surface of the wall (and correctly anchored) can help postpone the three classic failure modes of masonry walls: rocking (“flexural failure”), step cracking, and sliding (“shear failures”). Additionally, in some situations, they will postpone collapse by “keeping the bricks together” under large seismic deformations. On the other hand, the diagonal “X” shape was less successful and premature failure was developed during the test.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleIn-Plane Seismic Response of URM Walls Upgraded with FRP
typeJournal Paper
journal volume9
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Composites for Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:6(524)
treeJournal of Composites for Construction:;2005:;Volume ( 009 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record