Show simple item record

contributor authorDinesh Kumar
contributor authorBabu J. Alappat
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:30:09Z
date available2017-05-08T21:30:09Z
date copyrightJanuary 2009
date issued2009
identifier other%28asce%291090-025x%282009%2913%3A1%2875%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/53930
description abstractOver the last four decades, a number of environmental indices including water quality indices and air pollution indices have been formulated and used. Usually, the indices are formulated based either on studies conducted by the indices’ developers, or are formulated based on the Delphi technique, which takes into account the opinion of experts. In 1970, Brown et al. used the Delphi technique to formulate a water quality index (WQI) for the National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) of the United States. However, it has been observed that the procedure followed for the formulation of the index does not accurately represent the opinion of the experts who responded to questionnaires. In this technical note, the shortcomings in the formulation of the NSF-WQI are brought out and possible improvements in the development of this index are presented.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleNSF-Water Quality Index: Does It Represent the Experts’ Opinion?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume13
journal issue1
journal titlePractice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2009)13:1(75)
treePractice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management:;2009:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record