Show simple item record

contributor authorJames E. Smith Jr.
contributor authorRao Y. Surampalli
contributor authorRobert S. Reimers
contributor authorR. D. Tyagi
contributor authorBindu N. Lohani
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:30:05Z
date available2017-05-08T21:30:05Z
date copyrightJanuary 2008
date issued2008
identifier other%28asce%291090-025x%282008%2912%3A1%2810%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/53885
description abstractThis paper reviews the current United States sewage sludge disinfection regulations and their associated practices; discusses the limitations of the practices; the criteria employed in evaluating a new (innovative or alternative) disinfection process, and notes both some processes recently evaluated and ones evaluated. The United States regulations are designed to protect human health by minimizing the contact of humans with pathogenic microorganisms. Two types of disinfection processes are employed. Processes like pasteurization are employed to reduce pathogens below their analytical detection limits, while processes like anaerobic digestion are combined with requirements for organic matter reduction and access restrictions. Issues with the present disinfection alternatives such as their only being concerned with the presence or absence of certain pathogens like enteric viruses or
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDisinfection Processes and Stability Refinements to Biosolids Treatment Technologies
typeJournal Paper
journal volume12
journal issue1
journal titlePractice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2008)12:1(10)
treePractice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management:;2008:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record