Show simple item record

contributor authorH. Randolph Thomas
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:30:02Z
date available2017-05-08T21:30:02Z
date copyrightSeptember 1991
date issued1991
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281991%29117%3A3%28423%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/53842
description abstractThis paper describes the relationship between labor productivity and direct work as reported in work‐sampling studies. Seven data bases, collected primarily from nuclear‐power‐plant construction projects, are used. Investigations of a 30‐project data base show that direct work is better in the winter than during the rest of the year, is best during the start‐up and testing phase, and has improved since the Three Mile Island accident. It is concluded that these results are illogical. Using linear regression models, the paper shows that direct work is not related to productivity. This conclusion is based on three assumptions: Reducing wait time leads to increased direct‐work time, increased direct‐work time leads to better productivity, and better productivity is accompanied by less time spent waiting. Each assumption is tested, and the model statistics show very poor correlations and predictive capabilities. The most reliable data base, consisting of 46 data points, yielded an
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleLabor Productivity and Work Sampling: The Bottom Line
typeJournal Paper
journal volume117
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1991)117:3(423)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record