| contributor author | Cem Topkaya | |
| contributor author | Ahmet Serhat Kalaycı | |
| contributor author | Eric B. Williamson | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:25:46Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:25:46Z | |
| date copyright | July 2008 | |
| date issued | 2008 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%291084-0702%282008%2913%3A4%28418%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/51137 | |
| description abstract | A study has been undertaken to investigate different solver and shell element performances for curved bridge finite-element analysis. Three sparse solvers were implemented into a bridge finite-element analysis code, and the solution times and memory requirements for typical bridges were compared. In addition, the use of four-node and nine-node shell elements in modeling was investigated for different mesh densities. Based on the comparative studies performed, modeling guidelines for practicing engineers have been developed and are presented herein. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Solver and Shell Element Performances for Curved Bridge Analysis | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 13 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Bridge Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:4(418) | |
| tree | Journal of Bridge Engineering:;2008:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |
