Show simple item record

contributor authorDavid Trejo
contributor authorKenneth Reinschmidt
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:25:33Z
date available2017-05-08T21:25:33Z
date copyrightJanuary 2007
date issued2007
identifier other%28asce%291084-0702%282007%2912%3A1%2838%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/50992
description abstractTo optimize value, design engineers often need to make decisions on what materials should be used in a reinforced concrete (RC) bridge structure exposed to potentially corrosive environments. Part I of this paper series provided a methodology by which design engineers can easily identify sensitive variables affecting the service life of RC structures exposed to potentially corrosive environments. However, a material that significantly improves the resistance to corrosion may not add real value if the cost of the material is too high. The costs of materials that extend the service-life are not well established during the design process and designers are often in a quandary on how to select materials that optimize project value. Instead of estimating the costs of these durable materials that enhance the service life, this paper provides a methodology that examines the inverse question: How much more could a RC structure constructed with durable material cost, relative to the cost of the same structure constructed with conventional materials, and still be more economical?
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleJustifying Materials Selection for Reinforced Concrete Structures. II: Economic Analysis
typeJournal Paper
journal volume12
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:1(38)
treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2007:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record