Show simple item record

contributor authorAsif Quader
contributor authorYiping Guo
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:23:55Z
date available2017-05-08T21:23:55Z
date copyrightJanuary 2006
date issued2006
identifier other%28asce%291084-0699%282006%2911%3A1%2846%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/49910
description abstractThe recently developed analytical probabilistic approach was used for estimation of peak discharge rates in a practical design case. The results were compared with those from the commonly used design storm approach. Differences in meteorological data analysis and representation of rainfall input, subcatchment aggregation, and the treatment of the catchment time of concentration between the two approaches were identified as the three main causes contributing to the discrepancy in peak discharge estimates. In spite of the differences, peak discharge estimates from the two approaches are generally comparable for the actual design case. Furthermore, this study revealed that discrepancies caused by subcatchment aggregation and the difference in meteorological data analysis are approximately the same. Treating the time of concentration as a constant across storms of various magnitudes was found not to contribute to a large discrepancy. However, it was shown that the closer the time of concentration values used in the two approaches, the closer the resultant peak discharge estimates.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePeak Discharge Estimation Using Analytical Probabilistic and Design Storm Approaches
typeJournal Paper
journal volume11
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:1(46)
treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2006:;Volume ( 011 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record