Show simple item record

contributor authorS. Rocky Durrans
contributor authorRobert Pitt
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:23:40Z
date available2017-05-08T21:23:40Z
date copyrightJanuary 2004
date issued2004
identifier other%28asce%291084-0699%282004%299%3A1%2813%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/49758
description abstractMost of the literature dealing with hydrologic frequency analysis treats data as being exact and error free. This paper demonstrates that the use of common estimators for distribution parameters and quantiles can lead to serious biases and inadequate assessments of uncertainties when data are coarsely resolved, which is often the case for short-duration precipitation data. Alternative estimators are presented for cases of both data truncation and data rounding and are shown to be superior to common estimators for fitting of exponential and Gumbel probability distributions. A technique is also recommended for determination of the fraction of a data set that would be expected to consist of zeros, enabling an objective approach to augmentation of nonzero data.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMaximum Likelihood Estimators for Coarsely Resolved Precipitation Data
typeJournal Paper
journal volume9
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:1(13)
treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 009 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record