Show simple item record

contributor authorAmin Elshorbagy
contributor authorS. P. Simonovic
contributor authorU. S. Panu
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:23:23Z
date available2017-05-08T21:23:23Z
date copyrightOctober 2000
date issued2000
identifier other%28asce%291084-0699%282000%295%3A4%28424%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/49549
description abstractSpring runoff prediction in the Red River Valley, southern Manitoba, Canada, is an important issue because of the devastating effect of the flood of 1997 in that area. Increasing the accuracy of the prediction process is a practical necessity. This study looks at the artificial neural networks (ANN) technique and compares it to linear and nonlinear regression techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of the three modeling techniques are discussed. To fill the predictive accuracy evaluation gap left by the mean squared error and the mean relative error, a modified statistic, namely, pooled mean squared error, is developed and explained. The aim of this work is to show the applicability of ANN for runoff prediction and to evaluate their performances by comparing them with traditional techniques. In this study, according to the accuracy of results, the ANN models show superiority in most of the cases. However, in some situations, the performance of the other two techniques was comparable.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePerformance Evaluation of Artificial Neural Networks for Runoff Prediction
typeJournal Paper
journal volume5
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:4(424)
treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2000:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record