| contributor author | T. V. Hromadka II | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:23:06Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:23:06Z | |
| date copyright | July 1997 | |
| date issued | 1997 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%291084-0699%281997%292%3A3%28129%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/49377 | |
| description abstract | In practice, runoff peak flow rates are typically estimated by the rational method, a design storm unit hydrograph (UH) method, or a statistical regression equation. In this technical note, the balanced design storm UH procedure is used to derive a rational method peak flow rate equation that, in turn, is used to derive a regression equation. This new mathematical linkage across these three widely used peak flow rate estimation techniques provide a foundation as to how these approaches differ or agree, and may also provide an answer as to which method is “best”; specifically, the methods are essentially the same for many practical conditions, and where they differ, the underpinnings of their mathematical structures are illuminated. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Balanced Design Storm UH, Rational, and Regression Equation Methods | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 2 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Hydrologic Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1997)2:3(129) | |
| tree | Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;1997:;Volume ( 002 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |