Show simple item record

contributor authorT. V. Hromadka II
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:23:06Z
date available2017-05-08T21:23:06Z
date copyrightJuly 1997
date issued1997
identifier other%28asce%291084-0699%281997%292%3A3%28129%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/49377
description abstractIn practice, runoff peak flow rates are typically estimated by the rational method, a design storm unit hydrograph (UH) method, or a statistical regression equation. In this technical note, the balanced design storm UH procedure is used to derive a rational method peak flow rate equation that, in turn, is used to derive a regression equation. This new mathematical linkage across these three widely used peak flow rate estimation techniques provide a foundation as to how these approaches differ or agree, and may also provide an answer as to which method is “best”; specifically, the methods are essentially the same for many practical conditions, and where they differ, the underpinnings of their mathematical structures are illuminated.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleBalanced Design Storm UH, Rational, and Regression Equation Methods
typeJournal Paper
journal volume2
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1997)2:3(129)
treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;1997:;Volume ( 002 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record