Show simple item record

contributor authorMark Reiner
contributor authorKevin Rens
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:22:52Z
date available2017-05-08T21:22:52Z
date copyrightFebruary 2006
date issued2006
identifier other%28asce%291084-0680%282006%2911%3A1%2858%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/49215
description abstractAlthough fly ash as a partial replacement for cement has been utilized for many years, it has been almost exclusively used in low-volume percentages, such as 10 or 20% cement replacement. This paper looks at high-volume percentage replacements from 40 to 70%. A minimix study revealed that 50 and 60% cement replacement percentages were the best candidates for full-scale testing. The environmental benefits included a 25% reduction in smog, human health effects, and fossil fuel use compared to the same element built with a 100% Portland cement mix. The economic benefits included a 15% capital cost reduction and a 20% life-cycle cost reduction when compared with a 100% Portland cement mix. Full-scale testing included a complete mix design in addition to the construction of four concrete infrastructure products. The products built included an alley panel and curb, and gutter sections in the City and County of Denver, a precast manhole and lid, and a twin-tee prestressed girder.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleHigh-Volume Fly Ash Concrete: Analysis and Application
typeJournal Paper
journal volume11
journal issue1
journal titlePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2006)11:1(58)
treePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2006:;Volume ( 011 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record