Show simple item record

contributor authorBoyd C. Paulson, Jr.
contributor authorJohn W. Fondahl
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:22:41Z
date available2017-05-08T21:22:41Z
date copyrightDecember 1983
date issued1983
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281983%29109%3A4%28369%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/49063
description abstractConstruction craft jurisdiction, normally exercised by unions, includes both territorial and technological claims to certain categories of work. Jurisdiction is important to unions in maintaining membership, negotiating wages and benefits, defining apprenticeship programs, and establishing work rules. This paper reports on a research project that had three main objectives: (1) Collect and analyze statistics on the incidence of jurisdictional disputes; (2) evaluate existing jurisdictional dispute settlement mechanisms; and (3) survey contractors and owners to determine the impact of craft jurisdictional practices (not only disputes) on costs and schedules. The paper concludes that there is inadequate statistical information at present to support informed decision‐making on jurisdictional problems. Most dispute settlement mechanisms are antiquated and ineffective, but there are good plans in some local areas. The survey revealed that there are serious cost and schedule impacts on construction projects from observing craft jurisdictional practices.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleCraft Jurisdiction Impact on Construction
typeJournal Paper
journal volume109
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1983)109:4(369)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record