contributor author | Boyd C. Paulson, Jr. | |
contributor author | John W. Fondahl | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:22:41Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T21:22:41Z | |
date copyright | December 1983 | |
date issued | 1983 | |
identifier other | %28asce%290733-9364%281983%29109%3A4%28369%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/49063 | |
description abstract | Construction craft jurisdiction, normally exercised by unions, includes both territorial and technological claims to certain categories of work. Jurisdiction is important to unions in maintaining membership, negotiating wages and benefits, defining apprenticeship programs, and establishing work rules. This paper reports on a research project that had three main objectives: (1) Collect and analyze statistics on the incidence of jurisdictional disputes; (2) evaluate existing jurisdictional dispute settlement mechanisms; and (3) survey contractors and owners to determine the impact of craft jurisdictional practices (not only disputes) on costs and schedules. The paper concludes that there is inadequate statistical information at present to support informed decision‐making on jurisdictional problems. Most dispute settlement mechanisms are antiquated and ineffective, but there are good plans in some local areas. The survey revealed that there are serious cost and schedule impacts on construction projects from observing craft jurisdictional practices. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Craft Jurisdiction Impact on Construction | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 109 | |
journal issue | 4 | |
journal title | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1983)109:4(369) | |
tree | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 004 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |