Show simple item record

contributor authorCamilo Garcia
contributor authorDulcy M. Abraham
contributor authorSanjiv Gokhale
contributor authorTom Iseley
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:22:41Z
date available2017-05-08T21:22:41Z
date copyrightNovember 2002
date issued2002
identifier other%28asce%291084-0680%282002%297%3A4%28164%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/49062
description abstractSanitary and storm sewer collection systems are aging, and the reactive approach traditionally used for repair and rehabilitation is no longer appropriate. A comprehensive program including assessment of the existing infrastructure, adequate management, and clear understanding of the causes of deterioration in the sewer systems is imperative. Several rehabilitation alternatives are already in use, but on a restricted basis. This paper will discuss rehabilitation techniques used for concrete and brick sewers. The techniques considered include trenchless technologies such as slip liners, cured-in-place liners, and formed-in-place pipe liners. Also included are chemical grouts, coatings, and robotic rehabilitation. A comparison matrix and a case study of the Central Outfall Sewer in the city of Los Angeles are presented to compare different rehabilitation alternatives for underground infrastructure.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleRehabilitation Alternatives for Concrete and Brick Sewers
typeJournal Paper
journal volume7
journal issue4
journal titlePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2002)7:4(164)
treePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2002:;Volume ( 007 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record