Show simple item record

contributor authorJohn A. Kuprenas
contributor authorCarlos J. Soriano
contributor authorSanscho Ramhorst
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:22:21Z
date available2017-05-08T21:22:21Z
date copyrightMay 1996
date issued1996
identifier other%28asce%291084-0680%281996%291%3A2%2874%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/48856
description abstractA survey of six engineering and construction firms produced summary-level information regarding the implementation and utilization of formal Total Quality Management (TQM) programs. Specifically examined items in the survey were reasons for implementing TQM, the methodology used to implement TQM, and the effectiveness of the TQM implementation. An analysis of correlations between the categories of survey questions found strong links between the reasons for implementing TQM and the methodology used to implement TQM, as well as between the reasons for implementing TQM and the effectiveness of the TQM implementation. Surprisingly, links between the methodology used to implement TQM and the actual effectiveness of the TQM implementation did not appear to be strong. Future implementations of TQM will undoubtedly experience similar difficulties to what the survey firms experienced. If successful, however, a TQM implementation will not only improve the quality of the engineering work of a firm, but it will also improve employee morale and communications.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleTotal Quality Management Implementation and Results
typeJournal Paper
journal volume1
journal issue2
journal titlePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(1996)1:2(74)
treePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;1996:;Volume ( 001 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record