Show simple item record

contributor authorK. B. Anand
contributor authorK. Ramamurthy
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:21:58Z
date available2017-05-08T21:21:58Z
date copyrightJune 2001
date issued2001
identifier other%28asce%291076-0431%282001%297%3A2%2852%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/48623
description abstractThis technical note discusses water penetration resistance studies on a solid interlocking block masonry system, adopting ASTM E 514-90 for the influence of the type of bedding (dry stacking, thin jointing, and mortar), surface finishes (stucco and plaster on one side or both sides), and simulated wind velocities (0, 50, and 100 km/h). Silblock masonry without a surface finish is suitable for rain protected and interior walls. Introduction of any form of mortar bedding (thin jointing or conventional) resulted in higher dampness than the dry-stacked specimens. With respect to dampness, plastered dry-stacked masonry performs better, whereas with respect to leakage, plastered thin-jointed masonry performs better.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleInfluence of Construction Method on Water Permeation of Interlocking Block Masonry
typeJournal Paper
journal volume7
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2001)7:2(52)
treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2001:;Volume ( 007 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record