Show simple item record

contributor authorMichael E. Baumert
contributor authorErez N. Allouche
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:21:14Z
date available2017-05-08T21:21:14Z
date copyrightMarch 2002
date issued2002
identifier other%28asce%291076-0342%282002%298%3A1%2812%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/48151
description abstractThis paper reviews and evaluates three current design practices for calculating tensile loading during the installation of steel and polyethylene pipe using horizontal directional drilling (HDD). A sensitivity analysis of the three models revealed that while the relative influence of the various parameters is a function of the length of pipe within the bore, the predicted pulling load is very sensitive to mud weight and mud drag. This observed sensitivity is not supported by recent published test data. The three design approaches were used to model two recent HDD installations—one a 400-m double crossing of the Grand River, Brantford, Ontario, and the second a 350-m double crossing of the North Saskatchewan River, Edmonton, Alberta. Poor agreement was observed between the model predictions and the field recorded data, both in terms of the trends of the installation loads and the maximum predicted pull head load. It is suggested that additional research is needed to develop a model that better captures the physical reality in the borehole during an HDD installation.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMethods for Estimating Pipe Pullback Loads for Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) Crossings
typeJournal Paper
journal volume8
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:1(12)
treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2002:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record