Show simple item record

contributor authorKamyar C. Mahboub
contributor authorDonn E. Hancher
contributor authorYuhong Wang
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:35Z
date available2017-05-08T21:20:35Z
date copyrightOctober 2004
date issued2004
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%282004%29130%3A4%28255%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47712
description abstractAt the same time that state departments of transportation are allowing contractor-performed quality control, they are also concerned about using the contractor-reported data for acceptance and payment purposes. The question is, are we putting the fox in charge of guarding the chickens? To address this concern, a large number of asphalt and concrete projects in Kentucky were examined. The statistical analyses showed that for the most part there is no significant difference between the contractor-performed acceptance data and concomitant highway agency-performed verification data. This is obviously a very encouraging finding that is expected to enhance the level of trust between the contractors and highway agencies.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleContractor-Performed Quality Control: Is the Fox Guarding the Henhouse?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume130
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2004)130:4(255)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record