Show simple item record

contributor authorFlorence Yean Yng Ling
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:32Z
date available2017-05-08T21:20:32Z
date copyrightApril 2004
date issued2004
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%282004%29130%3A2%28120%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47683
description abstractThis technical note investigates the importance of fees to architects and engineers (A/Es) with respect to the need of clients to minimize production costs. Data were collected by in-depth interviews with 12 subject-matter experts from the construction industry. The main finding is that, when it comes to the selection and engagement of consultant A/Es, the Economic Theory of the Firm regarding the need to minimize production cost and maximize profit is applicable to design-builders and A/Es, respectively. Design/builders do regard low fees as important, because their overall competitiveness is also dependent on how much fees their design consultants are charging them. Client organizations pointed out that it is not very important to select low-fee A/Es. Their reasons are the need to employ quality consultants, the fact that fee is not a cost significant item as compared with the overall development cost, and the need to motivate consultants by paying them adequate fees.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleConsultancy Fees: Dichotomy between A/E’s Need to Maximize Profit and Employers’ Need to Minimize Cost
typeJournal Paper
journal volume130
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2004)130:2(120)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record