Show simple item record

contributor authorP. Aarne Vesilind
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:21Z
date available2017-05-08T21:20:21Z
date copyrightOctober 2001
date issued2001
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%282001%29127%3A4%28184%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47560
description abstractIn this paper, I use the case of the defective rear cargo door on the DC-10 aircraft and specifically the actions of the chief engineer at Convair to illustrate the sometimes frustrating problem of deciding just what skills are most useful to engineers if they are to best serve the public need. I suggest that although colleges of engineering are required by society (and accrediting agencies) to prepare engineers to solve technical problems using applied natural sciences such as physics and chemistry, they also should require engineering students to obtain a background in social sciences such as economics, political science, management, and ethics. I argue that engineering should therefore be thought of as not only an “applied natural science,” but also an “applied social science.”
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEngineering As Applied Social Science
typeJournal Paper
journal volume127
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2001)127:4(184)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2001:;Volume ( 127 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record