Show simple item record

contributor authorEnno “Ed” Koehn
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:10Z
date available2017-05-08T21:20:10Z
date copyrightApril 1997
date issued1997
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281997%29123%3A2%2866%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47425
description abstractThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has recommended a revised set of accreditation criteria that is designed to assure that graduates of accredited programs are prepared to enter the practice of engineering. The proposal also specifies that engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates possess 11 educational attributes. Undergraduate and graduate engineering students as well as practitioners consider three of the 11 attributes to be particularly important. These include: (1) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; (2) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; and (3) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. In contrast, two attributes received low ratings from all three groups. They include: (1) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, lifelong learning; and (2) a knowledge of contemporary issues. This suggests that not all ABET educational attributes are considered by students and practitioners to have the same level of significance and perhaps should not be stressed to the same degree in an engineering curriculum.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEngineering Perceptions of ABET Accreditation Criteria
typeJournal Paper
journal volume123
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1997)123:2(66)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record