Show simple item record

contributor authorWalter W. Boles
contributor authorJing Wang
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:04Z
date available2017-05-08T21:20:04Z
date copyrightJanuary 1996
date issued1996
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281996%29122%3A1%2812%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47377
description abstractApplications of automation and robotics are cited as part of the solution to improve productivity, quality, working conditions, and skilled labor shortages in the construction industry. One potential area of importance is that of infrastructure rehabilitation. Since civil engineers play an important role in construction and infrastructure rehabilitation, teaching construction automation and robotics to civil engineering students has become a contemporary issue over the past eight to 10 years. The objective of this paper is to explore the issue of whether dedicated, in-depth courses in construction automation are required or whether it is better to treat the subject with a breadth approach and as part of other construction engineering courses. This paper includes results of a review of current literature, responses from colleagues pursuing the subject, and alternative methods of incorporating construction automation and robotics topics into civil engineering curricula. It is concluded that civil engineering courses fully dedicated to construction automation are not always necessary or appropriate.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleConstruction Automation and Robotics in Civil Engineering Education Programs
typeJournal Paper
journal volume122
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1996)122:1(12)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1996:;Volume ( 122 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record