Show simple item record

contributor authorRichard H. McCuen
contributor authorPeter C. Chang
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:02Z
date available2017-05-08T21:20:02Z
date copyrightOctober 1995
date issued1995
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281995%29121%3A4%28220%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47363
description abstractEvaluation of multimedia-based engineering education should be a continual process from the planning phase, through the implementation, to the postimplementation phase, instead of the traditional end-of-course evaluation. Specification of prerequisites and objectives, development of measurement instruments, and strategy of implementation are some of the important items that should be evaluated in the planning stage to ensure maximum implementation success. Evaluation during the implementation phase ensures that unforeseen problems be corrected. Postimplementation evaluation should extend much beyond the end-of-course evaluation to evaluate important measures, such as retention rate. Some longitudinal evaluations of retention rate based on performance of students are suggested. Evaluation of the multimedia-based instruction on the course level and curriculum level are discussed and outlined. Use of value-added criteria to evaluate the success of multimedia-based instruction compared to the traditional text-lecture-laboratory-test paradigm is suggested.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMultimedia-Based Instruction in Engineering Education: Evaluation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume121
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1995)121:4(220)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1995:;Volume ( 121 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record