Show simple item record

contributor authorRonald A. Chadderton
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:49Z
date available2017-05-08T21:19:49Z
date copyrightOctober 1993
date issued1993
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281993%29119%3A4%28427%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47239
description abstractThe major elements of the study described are: (1) A brief historical background of the transcontinental‐railroad construction era; (2) a summary of arguments which appeared during debates over these railroads; (3) a comparison of two railroads that had opposite financial policies; (4) an assessment of the efficacy of the subsidy policies; and (5) an attempt to relate the experience of the transcontinental‐railroad case to the more general issue of governmental intervention in so‐called engineering projects. A variety of sources including historians, economists, philosophers, political scientists, and popular “literature” is cited. Many of these authors have expressed unfavorable opinions concerning the extent of subsidized railroad construction in the last half of the 19th century and the magnitude of government subsidies involved. A better understanding of long‐term effects of short‐term policy is urged. One justification for the present study is to bring this variety of materials to the attention of engineering students who may become planners or leaders of large‐scale projects during their careers.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleLand‐Grant Policy and Engineering Education
typeJournal Paper
journal volume119
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1993)119:4(427)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record