Show simple item record

contributor authorRonald A. Chadderton
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:49Z
date available2017-05-08T21:19:49Z
date copyrightOctober 1993
date issued1993
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281993%29119%3A4%28346%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47232
description abstractThis paper presents results of a survey of civil engineering systems analysis courses and a review of the four most commonly used textbooks. The numerical techniques of systems analysis appear to be appropriate for certain types of problems. These may be called “technological” as opposed to “economic” problems. The size of a problem appropriate to systems analysis methods must not be too large, although this limiting size is not precisely determinate. An Austrian assessment of the economic foundations of systems analysis shows that the typical content of systems analysis courses and their prerequisites are deficient. Descriptions of fundamental economic concepts are confused. Suggestions are offered to complete these most important ideas for the students and to complement the content of the typical systems analysis course work.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMisesian Assessment of Systems Analysis
typeJournal Paper
journal volume119
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1993)119:4(346)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record