Show simple item record

contributor authorW. F. Marcuson, III
contributor authorRicardo Dobry
contributor authorJohn D. Nelson
contributor authorRichard D. Woods
contributor authorT. L. Youd
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:24Z
date available2017-05-08T21:19:24Z
date copyrightJanuary 1991
date issued1991
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281991%29117%3A1%281%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47038
description abstractThis paper summarizes discussions held at the 1990 National Forum on Education and Continuing Development of Civil Engineering concerning geotechnical engineering education. We can attract better students by improving the public's perception and image of civil engineers. We believe more emphasis should be placed on classroom teaching. We also believe that if we put a premium on teaching, we will get excellence in teaching. However, priorities must be revised to help achieve this goal. In recognition of the ever‐changing need of our profession and the broad nature of the problems of the society we serve, we must provide a background for our civil engineers to work in a multidisciplinary world. This includes a broad‐based education with a well‐founded understanding of basic sciences, mathematics, and engineering sciences, and traditional disciplines of civil engineering. The current flexibility in the master's program must be retained. Today, the entry‐level degree to the profession of geotechnical engineering is the master's degree, and this is as it should be.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleIssues in Geotechnical Engineering Education
typeJournal Paper
journal volume117
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1991)117:1(1)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record