Show simple item record

contributor authorJack D. Bakos, Jr.
contributor authorRandal J. Hake
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:02Z
date available2017-05-08T21:19:02Z
date copyrightOctober 1987
date issued1987
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281987%29113%3A4%28321%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46789
description abstractRecent trends indicate that suits against professionals, including engineers, are on the increase. Laws are more sympathetic to those injured by the actions of various professionals. Until the mid‐1950s, the engineer was relatively immune to that type of lawsuit. Since then, however, courts have attempted to impose, liability on engineers because of their responsibilities in the design and construction processes. Engineers must be aware of that liability. However, it may not be so clear that an engineer who occasionally “moonlights” may be exposed to significant liability. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the potential liability of the moonlighter or the engineer who gives casual or gratuitous advice and to suggest ways in which that liability might be avoided. The various theories of liability are examined and analyzed to determine if they are applicable to the moonlighter or the casual consultant. Finally, the alternatives that might reduce a potential liability are presented.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleProfessional Liability Exposure of Casual Consultants
typeJournal Paper
journal volume113
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1987)113:4(321)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record