Show simple item record

contributor authorOmar Saeed Baghabra Al-Amoudi
contributor authorIbrahim Mohammed Asi
contributor authorHamad I. Al-Abdul Wahhab
contributor authorZiauddin A. Khan
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:17:28Z
date available2017-05-08T21:17:28Z
date copyrightDecember 2002
date issued2002
identifier other%28asce%290899-1561%282002%2914%3A6%28512%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/45810
description abstractThis investigation was conducted to assess the efficacy of the Clegg impact hammer (CIH) for estimating the strength of compacted soils by conducting a comparative study between the California-bearing ratio (CBR) and CIH tests. The study was carried out in two phases. In phase 1, compacted marl samples were prepared in the laboratory under three different compactive efforts and different molding moisture contents and then subjected to CBR and CIH tests. Phase 2 focused on conducting in situ CBR and CIH tests on existing soils at some preselected locations as part of ongoing projects in Saudi Arabia. The test results of both phases were statistically analyzed and indicated that the Clegg impact value correlates relatively well with the CBR value for both the laboratory and field tests. These correlations were compared with those reported in the literature. A general, reliable, best-fit model has been proposed for the laboratory, field, and literature data.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleClegg Hammer—California-Bearing Ratio Correlations
typeJournal Paper
journal volume14
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:6(512)
treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2002:;Volume ( 014 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record