Show simple item record

contributor authorMohamed Maalej
contributor authorVictor C. Li
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:16:48Z
date available2017-05-08T21:16:48Z
date copyrightNovember 1994
date issued1994
identifier other%28asce%290899-1561%281994%296%3A4%28513%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/45387
description abstractIn this paper the flexural behavior of a strain‐hardening engineered cementitious composite (ECC) is studied and compared with that observed in a regular fiber‐reinforced cementitious composite (FRC). Unlike concrete or regular FRC, ECC materials are characterized by their ability to sustain higher levels of loading after first cracking while undergoing additional straining. This strain‐hardening behavior gives ECCs a significant advantage under flexural loading. In quasi‐brittle material such as regular FRC, the ratio of flexural strength (the modulus of rupture) to tensile strength is known to vary between 1 and 3, depending on the details of the reinforcement and the geometry of the specimen. In this paper, the strain‐hardening behavior observed in an ECC led to a high flexural‐strength‐to‐tensile‐strength ratio. In a third‐point bending test, the flexural strength of an ECC was measured to be five times its tensile (first‐cracking) strength. This result was also predicted by a simple theoretical model. The model can be used for the purpose of optimizing the flexural strength of ECCs.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleFlexural/Tensile‐Strength Ratio in Engineered Cementitious Composites
typeJournal Paper
journal volume6
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1994)6:4(513)
treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;1994:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record