Show simple item record

contributor authorP. Laplante
contributor authorP.‐C. Aitcin
contributor authorD. Vézina
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:16:36Z
date available2017-05-08T21:16:36Z
date copyrightFebruary 1991
date issued1991
identifier other%28asce%290899-1561%281991%293%3A1%2819%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/45248
description abstractThe abrasion resistance of 12 concretes is compared with the ASTM C779‐82 (procedure C) testing method. Four different types of aggregates were used; their source rocks are completely characterized in terms of compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, Los Angeles loss, and abrasion resistance. The first series of air‐entrained concretes show that while silica fume can slightly improve concrete abrasion resistance, coarse aggregate nature is more significant. The second series, focusing on the effect of water/cementitious ratio (
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAbrasion Resistance of Concrete
typeJournal Paper
journal volume3
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1991)3:1(19)
treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;1991:;Volume ( 003 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record