Show simple item record

contributor authorVikram Pakrashi
contributor authorBiswajit Basu
contributor authorAlan O’Connor
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:16:30Z
date available2017-05-08T21:16:30Z
date copyrightOctober 2009
date issued2009
identifier other%28asce%290893-1321%282009%2922%3A4%28466%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/45193
description abstractThis work isolates cases of nondetection, false alarm, and insensitivity for a general class of problems dealing with the detection and characterization of existence, location, and extent of singularities embedded in signals or in their derivatives when employing kurtosis- and pseudofractal-based methods for the detection and characterization process. The nondetection, false alarm, and insensitivity for these methods are illustrated on an example problem of damage identification and calibration in beams where the singularity to be identified lies in the derivative of the measured signal. The findings are general, not constrained to linear systems, and are potentially applicable to a wide range of fields including engineering system identification, fault detection, health monitoring of mechanical and civil structures, sensor failure, aerospace engineering, and biomedical engineering.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleNondetection, False Alarm, and Calibration Insensitivity in Kurtosis- and Pseudofractal-Based Singularity Detection
typeJournal Paper
journal volume22
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Aerospace Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2009)22:4(466)
treeJournal of Aerospace Engineering:;2009:;Volume ( 022 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record