Show simple item record

contributor authorAlan K. Caserio
contributor authorRobin Shepherd
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:15:33Z
date available2017-05-08T21:15:33Z
date copyrightJanuary 1989
date issued1989
identifier other%28asce%290893-1321%281989%292%3A1%2820%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/44648
description abstractIn many dynamic analysis procedures the size of the problem is curtailed by truncation of the modes selected for study. A preferable approach in the case of a structure such as a large space frame is to identify and include those natural modes in the order of their increasing importance. Two of the many criteria which can be used to determine importance are examined in this paper. The first involves establishment of a “completeness index” reflecting the model identities satisfied by the natural frequencies and integrals of the mode shapes. The second involves displacements at a point of excitation and a response point. Both selection methods are implemented on a simplified model of the Initial Operating Configuration Space Station and comparative transient response analyses are made. It is shown that mode selection is a function of more than one variable. The first method performs well in reducing model error yet the second is necessary to predict those modes excited by various forcing functions when control of displacements is the chief concern. Different mode selection criteria will be necessary when other variables are involved.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSpace Station Structure Modal Selection Criteria
typeJournal Paper
journal volume2
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Aerospace Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(1989)2:1(20)
treeJournal of Aerospace Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 002 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record