Show simple item record

contributor authorTarek M. Zayed
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:15:02Z
date available2017-05-08T21:15:02Z
date copyrightFebruary 2004
date issued2004
identifier other%28asce%290887-3828%282004%2918%3A1%2836%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/44324
description abstractGovernment authorities are responsible for managing their available budget so that they gain maximum benefit. Therefore, they must make intelligent decisions as to which projects will be funded and the degree of funding. Dynamic programming (DP), integer programming (IP), and greedy heuristic (GH) approaches have been applied to optimize a two-year budget allocation for repainting steel bridges in Indiana. The optimal solution and the objective function values resulting from application of DP, IP, and GH are similar. The Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) divides Indiana into six districts. The results show that District 1 has the highest budget allocation percentage (28%). It has the lowest percent in the first year and the highest percent in the second year. District 2 has the lowest percentage (11%). A sensitivity analysis has been completed to show the potential alternative solutions that assist INDOT decision makers in solving their budget allocation problems.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleBudget Allocation for Steel Bridge Paint Maintenance
typeJournal Paper
journal volume18
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2004)18:1(36)
treeJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2004:;Volume ( 018 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record