Show simple item record

contributor authorSteven C. Helfrich
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:14:42Z
date available2017-05-08T21:14:42Z
date copyrightFebruary 1997
date issued1997
identifier other%28asce%290887-3828%281997%2911%3A1%2842%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/44114
description abstractSubgrade soils supporting a 0.3 m diameter sewer pipe settled approximately 50 mm, and caused approximately 21% of the 730-m-long pipeline to be removed and replaced. The paper analyzes several reasons for the failure, and presents several lessons learned from the failure. Characterization of the subsurface conditions and incorporation of these results during design and construction could have prevented the failure. In addition, inspection and testing of the subgrade soils followed procedures developed based on the assumption that the subsurface conditions had been adequately characterized. The paper points out several problems relating to the roles during design and construction of the municipal agency, the water district, the geotechnical engineer, and the contractor on the project. The division of construction inspection responsibilities on the project led to a crucial part of the project (the trench bottom) not subject to any inspection. The cost of the pipe replacement was more than 30 times the cost of a detailed subsurface investigation that should have been performed for the project.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleInvestigation of Sewer-Line Failure
typeJournal Paper
journal volume11
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1997)11:1(42)
treeJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;1997:;Volume ( 011 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record