Show simple item record

contributor authorRubin M. Zallen
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:14:22Z
date available2017-05-08T21:14:22Z
date copyrightNovember 1990
date issued1990
identifier other%28asce%290887-3828%281990%294%3A4%28208%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/43917
description abstractThis paper presents a specific proposal for a mandatory peer review of structural design that could be incorporated into a governmental regulation. The proposal requires review of the structural design as it is shown in the final plans and specifications, since this would be the principal interest of the governmental regulator. The proposal describes the classes of structures that would require review, defines what parts of these structures need to be reviewed, defines the qualifications of the reviewing engineer, provides criteria for the review, and provides a procedure for resolving disputes that may arise from the review. Following the proposal is a commentary on its various provisions with alternate approaches for dealing with some of the issues of design peer review. The proposal is intended to elicit vigorous debate on this controversial subject with the expectation that the debate will lead to a consensus on the subject. It is also intended to create a greater awareness of the details of the process in the profession.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleProposal for Structural Design Peer Review
typeJournal Paper
journal volume4
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1990)4:4(208)
treeJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;1990:;Volume ( 004 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record