Show simple item record

contributor authorFaizan Ahmad Lali
contributor authorRahul Raj Singh
contributor authorSyed Waqar Haider
date accessioned2026-02-16T21:55:57Z
date available2026-02-16T21:55:57Z
date copyright2025/06/01
date issued2025
identifier otherJPEODX.PVENG-1689.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4309942
description abstractPavement mechanistic-empirical design (PMED) is a modern approach to designing new and rehabilitated pavements. The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) follows the current guideline methodology for rehabilitation designs, utilizing hot-mix asphalt (HMA) overlays on rubblized plain cement concrete (PCC) pavements as new flexible pavement. PMED offers an alternative of HMA overlay on fractured jointed plain cement concrete (JPCP) for rubblized pavements. This paper investigates the optimal design approach and HMA input level for rubblized pavements in Michigan, comparing performance predictions using global and locally calibrated models across three input levels. Results indicated negligible differences between new and overlay designs at global performance predictions for input Levels 1 and 3. Local calibration at Level 1 produced better outcomes, but Level 3 results were also acceptable, barring the thermal cracking model. The study analyzed 11 pavement sections, revealing that HMA thicknesses were, on average, 1.02 cm thinner than current guideline designs. A new flexible pavement design with Level 1 data input is recommended for rubblized pavements in Michigan. This study aims to improve HMA overlay design on rubblized pavements, promoting efficient, cost-effective pavement rehabilitation. Although several studies are available on implementing the PMED for new pavements, research on rehabilitated pavements is limited. Moreover, different design options and input levels in the PMED and data unavailability make the design of rehabilitated pavements more challenging. By comparing PMED design options (overlay and new), calibration methods, and input levels (Levels 1, 2, and 3), the study seeks to enhance prediction accuracy for key pavement distresses. These findings will aid practitioners in selecting the optimal design and input level for effective rehabilitation, especially when data availability is challenging. The study’s findings validate the MDOT current practice of treating HMA overlays over rubblized concrete as new flexible pavements.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMechanistic-Empirical Design for Rubblized Pavements in Michigan
typeJournal Article
journal volume151
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
identifier doi10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1689
journal fristpage04025020-1
journal lastpage04025020-11
page11
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record