Show simple item record

contributor authorHuairui Luo
contributor authorFengyun Liu
contributor authorXusheng Wan
contributor authorYingxue Liu
contributor authorKunming Ye
date accessioned2025-08-17T22:43:03Z
date available2025-08-17T22:43:03Z
date copyright9/1/2025 12:00:00 AM
date issued2025
identifier otherJCRGEI.CRENG-901.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307340
description abstractGeopolymer-stabilized soil is a low-carbon material widely used in engineering, but it often faces complex engineering environments. In cold regions, factors such as low temperature curing, chloride salt erosion, and freeze–thaw cycles (FTCs) seriously affect the mechanical properties of geopolymer-stabilized soil, which pose challenges to the stability of the foundation and engineering construction. The deterioration characteristics of geopolymer-stabilized soil were studied by the chloride erosion FTC coupling test and the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test. The UCS, degradation rate, stress–strain curve, and deformation modulus of geopolymer-stabilized soil were analyzed, and the deterioration mechanism was explained from a microscopic perspective. The results indicated that with an increase in chloride concentration, the UCS of geopolymer-stabilized soil gradually decreased. The critical number of FTCs for the geopolymer-stabilized soil in water and chloride salt solution was three times, and the degradation rate exceeded 25% after three FTCs. The polymerization products of low temperature curing samples were fewer, and there were more unreacted geopolymer materials, making low temperature curing samples more susceptible to chloride erosion and FTCs. The final degradation rate of C(20) ranged from 37.72% to 46.81%, C(-2) ranged from 40.29% to 62.46%, and C(-10) ranged from 47.50% to 62.38%. After FTCs, the polymerization products of geopolymer-stabilized soil decreased. Chlorine salt erosion affected the polymerization rate and the total amount of polymerization products. Due to its high porosity, the low temperature curing sample was more susceptible to chlorine salt erosion, resulting in more corrosion products. By contrast, the internal structure of the room temperature sample was more compact and more susceptible to FTCs. With the continuous advancement of construction in cold regions, geopolymer-stabilized soil inevitably bears low temperature curing in cold regions. In addition to the low temperature in northwestern China, geopolymer-stabilized soil is damaged by the coupling action of freeze–thaw cycles and chloride salt erosion. Cold regions in other parts of the world also have similar saline soils. In spite of variations in temperature and salt concentration in different regions of the world, this study has practical reference value for understanding the deterioration behavior of geopolymer-stabilized soil. Although the deterioration behavior of geopolymer-stabilized soil under the coupling action of freeze–thaw cycles and chloride salt erosion was studied, the shear strength and durability of geopolymer-stabilized soil were not studied. Therefore, it is necessary to research the shear strength change of geopolymer-stabilized soil, which can provide more theoretical support for field application.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDeterioration Behavior of Geopolymer-Stabilized Soil under the Coupling Action of Freeze–Thaw Cycles and Chloride Salt Erosion
typeJournal Article
journal volume39
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Cold Regions Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/JCRGEI.CRENG-901
journal fristpage04025025-1
journal lastpage04025025-13
page13
treeJournal of Cold Regions Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 039 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record