| description abstract | In construction project management, the optimization of time, cost, and quality trade-off is essential for maximizing overall project benefits. While various algorithms have been proposed to address this multiobjective optimization problem, there remains a significant research gap in the efficiency and effectiveness of selection operators in guiding the search process toward optimal solutions. Additionally, many existing methods are computationally expensive, making them impractical for large-scale projects. Therefore, this study proposes use of strength Pareto-based Rao algorithms (SP2-Rao-1 and -2) as an approach to solving multiobjective time–cost–quality problems in construction projects with better optimization performance at lower computation costs. Furthermore, to explore the impact of the selection operators that determine the candidates for subsequent iterations in multiobjective optimization tasks, Rao algorithms with nondominated sorting and a crowding distance operator (NDSII-Rao-1 and -2) were also implemented. The performance of the strength Pareto-based Rao algorithms was evaluated using two case studies with 18 and 60 activities, respectively. The developed SP2-Rao series were compared with opposition-based multiple objective differential evolution (OMODE) and multiobjective artificial bee colony with differential evolution (MOABCDE) algorithms, which have previously been used to solve similar problems. The findings indicated that the SP2-Rao series surpassed earlier techniques in addressing multiobjective construction time–cost–quality problems, achieving greater efficiency and effectiveness with reduced function evaluations. Moreover, the SP2-Rao algorithms produced significantly better results compared to the NDSII-Rao algorithms. This study presents the strength Pareto method to assist construction managers in effectively balancing the essential factors of time, budget, and quality in their projects. This advanced optimization strategy provides faster and more efficient means of identifying optimal solutions among competing objectives. Most importantly, it gives project managers a set of optimum choices, thus providing the latitude of choice to identify the option that best suits their needs. Also, the method consumes less time and computational resources compared to other methods, hence its applicability on both large- and small-scale projects. For instance, managers can easily evaluate a number of optimum choices so as to identify a plan that would be viable economically without compromising quality or causing delays in the schedule. This paper provides construction professionals with a comprehensive tool for informed decision-making, thereby assisting them in managing projects more effectively and addressing prevalent industry challenges such as delays, budget overruns, and quality compromises. | |
