| description abstract | RC columns are commonly strengthened using external bonding (EB) of carbon fiber–reinforced polymer (CFRP) materials. The confinement effect provided by the EB of CFRP fabric is highly effective for short columns under axial compression. However, the effectiveness of the EB confinement reduces drastically for slender columns particularly under eccentric compression. Bending demand increases due to lateral deformations from second-order effects when slender columns deform under eccentric compression. The near-surface mounting (NSM) of CFRP laminates is ineffective under axial compression because NSM does not increase axial rigidity compared with flexural rigidity. However, NSM strengthening is highly effective in resisting the bending dominant loads, acting as an additional tension reinforcement. Hybrid (HYB) fiber–reinforced polymer (FRP) strengthening combines the advantages of EB confinement and improved flexural rigidity from NSM laminates. Control and FRP-strengthened columns with different techniques, such as EB, NSM, and HYB, are tested at eccentricity ratios of 0.42 and 0.85. Columns of different lengths are tested to understand the slenderness effect. The test results are compared with analytical predictions, considering material and geometric nonlinearities. The results indicate that the efficiency of EB confinement reduces with an increase in slenderness and eccentricity ratio. NSM laminate strengthening is ineffective for strength improvement of short columns but effective for slender columns. Hybrid FRP strengthening resulted in the best performance improvement for both short and slender columns under eccentric compression. This research paper highlights the importance of using appropriate fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)-strengthening configurations when compression members (columns in buildings and piers in bridges) become slender/taller and are subjected to a combination of axial compression and bending loading. Strengthening of columns with carbon fiber–reinforced polymer (CFRP) fabric using external bonding (EB) is widely used to enhance the capacity of existing columns. However, EB strengthening is only effective for short columns with circular cross sections and subject to axial compression. The near-surface mounting (NSM) of CFRP laminates is ineffective under axial compression because the axial strength of the columns only improves marginally compared with flexural strength because it acts as an additional longitudinal reinforcement. However, existing columns in buildings and bridges are rectilinear (shape), larger (cross section size), and taller (slender). Also, in most cases, these compression members are subjected to bending (due to eccentricity of loading and slenderness) in addition to axial compression. The innovative hybrid strengthening configuration adopted in this study proves highly effective in real-case scenarios of geometry and variations in loading conditions. This investigation is part of a more extensive study on the effect of size, shape, and slenderness on different FRP strengthening techniques, including EB, NSM, and hybrid FRP configuration. | |
