Show simple item record

contributor authorNageswara Rao Kolikipogu
contributor authorPrabhat Kumar Mandal
contributor authorArka Jyoti Das
contributor authorSubhashish Tewari
contributor authorRana Bhattacharjee
contributor authorJohn Loui Porathur
contributor authorVinod Kumar Jagapthal
date accessioned2025-08-17T22:14:10Z
date available2025-08-17T22:14:10Z
date copyright6/1/2025 12:00:00 AM
date issued2025
identifier otherIJGNAI.GMENG-10788.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4306646
description abstractThe line of extraction in Bord and Pillar (B&P) or Room and Pillar methods plays a paramount role in the extraction of coal pillars in underground mines. It is an important factor that has to be decided at the premining stage, and its optimization not only boosts productivity but also enhances the stability of underground operations. In Indian coal mines or in other B&P mines around the world, the quest to determine the effective line of extraction remains elusive. In Indian B&P coal mines, both diagonal and straight lines of extraction have been widely adopted. In one of such mines, Mine-A, situated in the southern part of India, several coal panels were successfully extracted in the middle seam using a continuous miner (CM) technology in straight and diagonal lines of extraction. However, local geomining effects, such as the influences of top seam panel goaves, barrier pillars, delays in main fall, surges in abutment loading, and increased convergence in roadways caused difficulties throughout the coal extraction in some panels of the middle seam CM workings. This underscores the need to evaluate the optimum line of extraction for successful pillar extraction in B&P workings. Hence, a study was undertaken with numerical modeling and extensive field observations. Strata monitoring instruments such as stress cells, rotary telltale, auto warning telltale, and 4-anchor extensometers were extensively utilized in the field to observe the stress distribution and roof displacement in both lines of extraction. Comparative analysis using field data and numerical modeling with FLAC3D (version 5.0) exhibited that in the diagonal line of extraction, incidents such as delays in major and main fall occurrences, surge in induced stress distribution, and increased rock load development were more prevalent than in the straight line of extraction. This analysis unequivocally demonstrated that a straight line of extraction offers better safety and more effectively reduces ground instabilities in CM panels. Furthermore, the principles of plate theory were used to interpret the roof deflection during the depillaring of the panels, and the modeling results were corroborated with these theoretical findings. This paper presents an approach for estimating the optimal line of extraction in the Bord and Pillar (B&P) or Room and Pillar method. The line of extraction is a crucial factor that must be determined during the premining stage to ensure the economical extraction of coal in continuous miner workings. For practitioners, understanding the geomining conditions of the mine site, the induced stress distribution on coal pillars, the failure mechanisms of the overburden strata, and the occurrence of convergence in mine roadways is essential in this approach. This approach boosts the mining engineers’ understanding of continuous miner workings that contribute to the safe and efficient extraction of coal.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAnalytical and Numerical Modeling Approaches for Estimating the Optimum Line of Extraction in Continuous Miner Workings with Field Observations
typeJournal Article
journal volume25
journal issue6
journal titleInternational Journal of Geomechanics
identifier doi10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-10788
journal fristpage04025098-1
journal lastpage04025098-16
page16
treeInternational Journal of Geomechanics:;2025:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record