Show simple item record

contributor authorLei Xu
contributor authorIris Tien
contributor authorJohn E. Taylor
date accessioned2025-04-20T10:32:46Z
date available2025-04-20T10:32:46Z
date copyright10/25/2024 12:00:00 AM
date issued2025
identifier otherJMENEA.MEENG-6168.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304929
description abstractPrevious studies have shown that responses to information on poor air quality are more discernible on active transport than on driving. However, it is unclear whether the differences in responses stem from the differences between the characteristics of transportation modes or the social context–related factors. We conducted a comparative study to evaluate the effectiveness of air quality alerts in influencing the usage of different transportation modes, namely, micromobility and driving. An examination of over 6.9 million micromobility trips and 3 million traffic counts revealed that usage behaviors on both transportation modes do not change in response to air quality alerts, but both decrease during the daytime of a polluted day. The findings suggest that several social context–related factors matter to the success of air quality alerts, including the overall societal attention/awareness of air quality and the coverage and access to more sustainable transportation modes to empower the public.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMicromobility versus Driving: How Air Quality Alerts Impact Transportation Choices
typeJournal Article
journal volume41
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-6168
journal fristpage04024064-1
journal lastpage04024064-10
page10
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 041 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record