Show simple item record

contributor authorJennifer G. Duan
contributor authorAli Arjmandi
contributor authorEvan Canfield
contributor authorEleonora Demaria
contributor authorDavid C. Goodrich
contributor authorKun Qi
date accessioned2025-04-20T09:59:12Z
date available2025-04-20T09:59:12Z
date copyright12/13/2024 12:00:00 AM
date issued2025
identifier otherJHYEFF.HEENG-6267.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4303781
description abstractAlthough the curve number (CN) method has been widely used in rainfall and runoff models, the physical interpretation of the CN method is still challenging, for instance how to estimate the potential maximum retention. This paper analyzed the historical rainfall and runoff event data from 1975 to 2021 for two arid to semiarid watersheds, the Santa Rita and the Lucky Hills experimental watersheds in Tucson, Arizona. As is well known, a constant CN for a watershed can be back-calculated by fitting the observed rainfall and runoff. This study found this constant CN increase with the ratio of initial abstraction. On the other hand, CN can also be back-calculated for each event using the observed rainfall and runoff. The event-based CN depends on precipitation, land use, types and density of vegetation, as well as soil properties. If assuming the potential maximum retention is equal to the cumulative infiltrated water in each rainfall event, we applied the Green–Ampt infiltration model to estimate the CN for each historical event and compared with the back-calculated event-based CN. We found that 71% of the calculated CNs fell in the 10% margin of error, and 88% were within the 20% margin of error compared with the observed data. This indicated that the retention in CN can be considered as the cumulative infiltrated water in each event and calculated using the soil properties and rainfall duration. This is the first physical-based quantitative interpretation of retention in CN that will enable the determination of CN for ungauged watersheds in remote areas. This paper presents a theoretical-based approach to estimate the CN number. The CN number for a watershed of complex land uses can be approximated using an equation presented in the paper, which is dependent on the total infiltrated water and the duration of storm event. The estimated CN numbers can be used as input to hydrologic models [i.e., hydrologic modeling system (HMS) and kinematic runoff and erosion model (KINEROS)] for simulating surface runoff from rainfall events.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleQuantification of Curve Numbers for Arid Watersheds
typeJournal Article
journal volume30
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-6267
journal fristpage04024059-1
journal lastpage04024059-8
page8
treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 030 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record