| description abstract | Many design regulations around the globe rely on member deflection as a governing criterion for resistance assessment in fire. The deflection evaluation in fire is generally achieved by conducting expensive experiments or computationally expensive finite-element analyses. This often restricts practicing engineers from using robust performance-based design philosophy for typical structures. Instead, they rely on objective design guidelines, often resulting in inefficient sizes of reinforced concrete (RC) members. Therefore, semiempirical relations are derived in the current study to determine the maximum deflection of the RC beam and RC column in a fire. Three separate end conditions are considered within the beam category: fixed-fixed beam, propped cantilever beam, and simply supported beam. Plausible variables are first identified that could affect the overall deflection of the member, and their proportionality is subsequently determined by performing one-on-one regression analysis. Furthermore, these relations are developed in terms of the most suitable fire intensity measures derived from the literature, which makes them applicable irrespective of the type of fire framework. The credibility of the deflection equations is validated through visual analysis followed by the three popular error indicator parameters, namely, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, relative root-mean squared error (RRMSE), and performance index. Results indicated that all deflection equations accurately predict the RC member behavior under fire. | |
